
Request for Proposals
Kansas NASA EPSCoR Program
NASA EPSCoR Basic Research FY 2027
KS NASA EPSCoR Program FY 2027 Basic Research RFP – Released October 30, 2026 Page 2 of 3
Selected proposers must be eligible and agree to comply with all applicable NASA-required terms and conditions as stated
in the NOFO and including prohibition on proposals “involving bilateral participation, collaboration, or coordination in any
way with China or any Chinese-owned company, whether funded or performed under a no- exchange-of-funds basis”.
There is a 20-page limit for all KNEP proposal content with exceptions noted below. The biographical sketches and current
and pending documents required for covered individuals must be submitted in the NASA-required format. For all other
documents, use one-inch margins, a 12-pt Times New Roman font, and single-spaced text.
To reduce burden on proposers while ensuring reviewers have sufficient information to evaluate readiness and alignment
with NASA priorities, the Kansas NASA EPSCoR Program (KNEP) requires the following proposal structure. This KNEP
proposal is not required to follow NASA formatting, page limits, or NSPIRES requirements, but must contain enough detail
for KNEP reviewers to assess competitiveness under the NASA FY 2027 EPSCoR Basic Research NOFO.
Proposers should review the NASA NOFO for complete federal requirements; selected proposals will be expected to prepare
a fully compliant NASA submission after down‑selection.
Proposals should address at a minimum the following within the 20-page combined limit:
1. Project Summary (1–2 pages recommended)
a. High‑level overview of the proposed research.
b. Clear statement of relevance to NASA’s missions and Research Focus Areas.
c. Identification and alignment with NASA Mission Directorate(s) or Center(s) (brief description only).
2. NASA Engagement Summary (1–2 pages recommended): This section demonstrates maturity of NASA alignment
without requiring formal NASA commitment letters. It should include:
a. Names/titles of NASA researchers contacted.
b. Summary of interactions to date (emails, meetings, discussions).
c. Expected roles or collaborations if selected.
d. Note: NASA collaborator commitment letters are not required and should not be requested. Proposers must
identify NASA researchers they have engaged with and summarize those interactions within the proposal
narrative
e. Note: The NOFO does require letters of support only when a proposer needs access to a facility or resource
not guaranteed to them. Example: using NASA‑unique facilities like thermal vac chambers, drop towers,
or wind tunnels requires a supporting letter from that center. Those letters will be required if applicable for
the final submission to NASA if the proposal is selected.
3. Scientific and Technical Narrative (8–10 pages recommended): This section should provide sufficient technical
detail to assess feasibility and intrinsic merit.
a. Background and motivation
b. Research objectives and hypotheses
c. Proposed technical approach
d. Expected outcomes and potential NASA impact
e. Description of existing capabilities, facilities, or prior work relevant to the project
4. Work Plan and Management Approach (2–3 pages recommended)
a. Key personnel and roles (PI, co‑Is, students, collaborators)
b. Management and communication plan
c. Milestones and high‑level timeline